485
contractor for the repairs to the Signal
man's have had stated at the Pease that
be would not
ordered, unlife
Commence
certain repairs
a
contract
MLO
aigned.
of wo
I acordingly sent for the
sent for the arsur
charge at the Pease and the contractor
to
Jer
if there
appeared there
MALVI
was
any difficully. It
I therefore sout for
Mr Clark and in his presence arranged?
The matter. In the cause
without
e-of caversation
any provocation
Clark informed
M
me that "he
my part Mr
AA
the habit of telling lies"," that "I
compitent to
not iv
LAD
not
wit to give him instructions" and that he would "wash his hands of the
whole business and have nothing
moe
to do with it." This conduct I subunit
was
grossly insubordinates. On Mr clave immediately after flatly contradicting me, I made use of the expressio complained of which I do not for
to justify. On
(who
are moment pretend
my sending for the Ausser was not in the room as stated by
Mr Clark) and finding I was mistätten,
I immediately retraced what I had said:
Having this answered the charges
made aganist
necessary for
occasions on
Me
by Mr. Clark it becomes me in self-defence to refer to
which I submit Mr. Clark
has refused to obey legitimate instructions,
and has aded in a
cannot as
manner which I
Head of the Departinent do
almrwise than bring
at the
present
A time
a
to the notice of this Excellency. Since Mr
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.